Apr 18, 2014

Inflation, Deflation, Default Or Run For Your Life ... Choose Your Poison

Common Sense Commentary: First let me define "dollar". A dollar in fiat currency or fiat digital form is a debt obligation. It is a Gov. IOU. It used to be backed by silver and gold in the good old days. Today it is backed by "The good faith and credit of the U.S. Government".  Since we are bankrupt, our Gov. has no good faith or credit left so the days of the good dollar are numbered.

What do the terms "Inflation and Deflation" mean. The common answer is, Inflation is too many dollars chasing too few goods and services, while Deflation is too many goods and services chasing too few dollars. My own answer is, Inflation happens when Government prints too many fiat dollars and Deflation is when Free Enterprise produces more goods and services than can be sold in the home country and should, therefore be exported to other countries which have an inflationary problem or a low Gross Domestic Product (GDP) problem and need to import goods and services. Since we have been exporting our producers instead of our production and exporting our dollars to buy foreign production imports, we are now seeing the first serious signs of Inflation which will surely become Hyper-Inflation if we do not slow imports, speed up exports and stop printing dollars. On the other hand, we have already gone too far in debt to remedy the problem ($17 Trillion in borrowed funds and up to $200 Trillion in contracted but unfunded debt obligations in Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and Federal Retirement promises).  Add to that Obamacare from cradle to the grave and we end up with empty cradles and everybody in the grave. So since our Gov has sold our birthright for a mess of porridge, with our co-operation like a lustful dope addict, they just have two options ... Default on all debt which leads to economic calamity, or Print enough new fiat money to pay the debt which leads to inflationary calamity (dollar ain't worth doodely). So don't blame the grocer or the distributor or the farmer, blame the worthless dollar printers up in the Fed Castle and the President, Congress, and Media in bed with them while the presses roar in the basement 24 hours a day. RB

Here, from todays news,  is what is beginning to happen in America. RB


"Living Standards Will Suffer" as Food Prices Surge

From USA Today - April 17. 2014

Food prices are registering sharp gains, climbing 4% in both February and March and threatening to put a damper on the economy.

What's happening is that wholesalers have raised the prices they charge grocers, and grocers in turn have passed along the increases to their customers, USA Today reports. That obviously creates a hardship for consumers, who account for about 70% of GDP.

"Living standards will suffer, as a larger percentage of household budgets are spent on grocery store bills, leaving less for discretionary spending," Chris Christopher, an economist at IHS Global Insight, told USA Today.


Rents No Longer "Affordable" for Most Americans

From The New York Times

April 17, 2014 - April 17, 20014

Demand for rental housing has soared over the past seven years, and that has pushed rents higher than many middle-class Americans can afford to pay.

A rule of thumb is that households shouldn't pay more than 30% of their income on rent and utilities.

But now half of U.S. renters devote more than 30% of their income to housing, up from 38% in 2000, revealed a report from Harvard University.

Housing Secretary Shaun Donovan has called this "the worst rental affordability crisis that this country has ever known.

WHAT IS DEFLATION?


Wicipedia Says:
In economicsdeflation is a decrease in the general price level of goods and services.[1] Deflation occurs when the inflation rate falls below 0% (a negative inflation rate). This should not be confused with disinflation, a slow-down in the inflation rate (i.e., when inflation declines to lower levels)

About.com Says:
The standard deflation definition is when asset and consumer prices continue to fall. This may seem like a great thing to consumers, except that the cause for widespread deflation is a long-term drop in demand. Unfortunately, a drop in demand means that a recession is probably already underway, with job losses, declining wages, and an ongoing decline in the value of your home and your stock portfolio. Deflation is a result of businesses dropping prices in a desperate attempt to get people to buy their products. 

Investopedia Says:
A general decline in prices, often caused by a reduction in the supply of money or credit. Deflation can be caused also by a decrease in government, personal or investment spending. The opposite of inflation, deflation has the side effect of increased unemployment since there is a lower level of demand in the economy, which can lead to an economic depression.

WHAT IS INFLATION?


Wicipedia Says:
In economicsinflation is a sustained increase in the general price level of goods and services in an economy over a period of time.[1] When the general price level rises, each unit of currency buys fewer goods and services. Consequently, inflation reflects a reduction in the purchasing power per unit of money – a loss of real value in the medium of exchange and unit of account within the economy.

About.com Says:
Because inflation is a rise in the general level of prices, it is intrinsically linked to money, as captured by the often heard refrain "Inflation is too many dollars chasing too few goods". To understand how this works, imagine a world that only has two commodities: Oranges picked from orange trees, and paper money printed by the government. In a year where there is a drought and oranges are scarce, we'd expect to see the price of oranges rise, as there will be quite a few dollars chasing very few oranges. Conversely, if there's a record crop or oranges, we'd expect to see the price of oranges fall, as orange sellers will need to reduce their prices in order to clear their inventory. These scenarios are inflation and deflation, respectively, though in the real world inflation and deflation are changes in the average price of all goods and services, not just one.

Investopedia Says:
During World War II, you could buy a loaf of bread for $0.15, a new car for less than $1,000 and an average house for around $5,000. In the twenty-first century, bread, cars, houses and just about everything else cost more. A lot more. Clearly, we've experienced a significant amount of inflation over the last 60 years. 

So, what is a husband, wife, parent, college graduate, workaholic or flunky supposed to do?
Kick the old bums, that did it to us, in D.C., out of office on election day. A few of the new ones have been fighting our battle, so leave them there. Not that it will solve the problem. Too late for that, but at least we will be rid of the old geniuses who betrayed our trust. Some of them are quiting already. Why anyone would want the job, now, is a mystery to me. They would have to either be a glutton for punishment, have a lust for power, or be a true partiot who wants to die for a good cause. RB


Apr 17, 2014

Vet, 95, Speaks His Peace To Obama

Common Sense Commentary:   A word to the wise ... from the wise...

"Thou shalt rise up .... and honour the face of the old man, 
and fear thy God: I am the LORD." Leviticus 19:32.    

"The (white hair) is a crown of glory, if it be found 
in the way of righteousness." Prov.16:31. 


95 year old hero! 

Letter To Obama at Whitehouse Sent from 95 year Old Pearl Harbor Survivor !!
Fantastic!!
This venerable and much honored WW II vet is well known in Hawaii  
for his seventy-plus years of service to patriotic organizations and causes all over the country.
A humble man without a political bone in his body, he has never spoken out before about a government official, until now. He dictated this letter to a friend, signed it and mailed it to the
president. 



Dear President Obama, 

My name is Harold Estes, approaching 95 on December 13 of this year. People meeting me for the first time don't believe my age because I remain wrinkle free and pretty much mentally alert. 

I enlisted in the U.S. Navy in 1934 and served proudly before, during and after WW II retiring as a Master Chief Bos'n Mate. Now I live in a "rest home" located on the western end of Pearl Harbor , allowing me to keep alive the memories of 23 years of service
to my country. 

One of the benefits of my age, perhaps the only one, is to speak my mind, blunt and direct even to the head man. 

So here goes. 

I am amazed, angry and determined not to see my country die before I do, but you seem hell bent not to grant me that wish.
I can't figure out what country you are the president of. 

You fly around the world telling our friends and enemies despicable lies like: 

" We're no longer a Christian nation" 

" America is arrogant" - (Your wife even 
announced to the world," America is mean- spirited. " Please tell her to try preaching
that nonsense to 23 generations of our 
war dead buried all over the globe who 
died for no other reason than to free a 
whole lot of strangers from tyranny and 
hopelessness.) 

I'd say shame on the both of you, but I don't think you like America, nor do I see an ounce of gratefulness in anything you do, for the obvious gifts this country has given you. To be without shame or gratefulness is a dangerous thing for a man sitting in the
White House. 

After 9/11 you said," America hasn't lived up to her ideals."

Which ones did you mean? Was it the notion of personal liberty that 11,000 farmers and shopkeepers died for to win independence from the British? Or maybe the ideal that no man should be a slave to another man, that 500,000 men died for in the Civil War? I
hope you didn't mean the ideal 470,000 fathers, brothers, husbands, and a lot of fellas I knew personally died for in WWII, because we felt real strongly about not letting any nation push us around, because we stand for freedom. 

I don't think you mean the ideal that says equality is better than discrimination. You know the one that a whole lot of white people understood when they helped to get you elected. 

Take a little advice from a very old geezer, young man. 


Shape up and start acting like an American. If you don't, I'll do what I can to see you get shipped out of that fancy rental on Pennsylvania Avenue . You were elected to lead not to bow, apologize and kiss the hands of murderers and corrupt leaders who still
treat their people like slaves. 

And just who do you think you are telling the American people not to jump to conclusions and condemn that Muslim major who killed 13 of his fellow soldiers and wounded dozens more. You mean you don't want us to do what you did when that white cop used force
to subdue that black college professor in Massachusetts , who was putting up a fight? You don't mind offending the police calling them stupid but you don't want us to offend Muslim fanatics by calling them what they are, terrorists. 

One more thing. I realize you never served in the military and never had to defend your country with your life, but you're the Commander-in-Chief now, son. Do your job. When your battle-hardened field General asks you for 40,000 more troops to complete the
mission, give them to him. But if you're not in this fight to win, then get out. The life of one American soldier is not worth the best political strategy you're thinking of. 

You could be our greatest president because you face the greatest challenge ever presented to any president. 

You're not going to restore American greatness by bringing back our bloated economy. That's not our greatest threat. Losing the heart and soul of who we are as Americans is our big fight now. 

And I sure as hell don't want to think my president is the enemy in this final battle... 


Sincerely, 

Harold B. Estes 
Snopes confirms as true: 
http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/haroldestes.asp 

When a 95 year old hero of the "the Greatest 
Generation" stands up and speaks out like 
this, I think we owe it to him to send his 
words to as many Americans as we can. 

Apr 16, 2014

Why Did The Fed's Chicken Out At Nevada Ranch?

Common Sense Commentary: Thank our Lord for a few courageous Americans who are willing to die if necessary to face down the enormous power of our out of control Federal Government. RB



Why The FEDS Chickened Out On A Nevada Ranch

By Kevin McCullough

Let me obliterate a bit of confusion here: the Obama administration attempted to go to war with a rancher in Nevada. Let me amplify a little bit of truth: They tucked tail and have returned home. And let me add a bit of clarity: they had no choice!
As the nation began to become familiar with the plight of the family of Cliven Bundy, many of us hearkened back to another standoff in which the Federal government attempted to bully it's outcome: Waco, Texas and the Branch Davidian massacre.
It is telling that in the Nevada case the feds pulled out so quickly, given all they had indicated they were willing to do to resolve the matter to their satisfaction. They had set up a perimeter around the Bundy's family land, ranch, and home. They had brought in extra artillery, dogs, and snipers. They were beginning the process of stealing more than 300 head of cattle that did not belong to them.
They did so--or so we were told--for the reason of protecting the desert tortoise. But then it was revealed that the Bureau of Land Management had shot far more desert tortoises than the Bundy cattle had even possibly destroyed. We were told they did it because the Bundys had broken federal laws by not paying what amounted to retroactive grazing fees to the federal government. But the Governor of the state of Nevada told us that Bundy had paid every ounce of state tax, met the state requirements, and their family had been improving the property more than 100 years previous. Finally we were allowed to know the connection between a communist Chinese wind/solar power plant and its connection to that senator named Harry Reid. Evidently a plan had been hatched to use the Bundy property for a solar farm and instead of paying the Bundys, someone, somewhere in the administration believed it was easier to just take what they wanted.
That approach is at least consistent with the readily documented abuse of eminent domain where the government for any number of reasons--few of them valid--have taken to taking what doesn't belong to them. Americans then watch as it gets handed over to some multi-national corporation for the "cause" of the "greater good."
The following is from OneNewsNow.comTownhall.com.


There were a few specific reasons why the feds chickened out in the Nevada desert though.
  1. Technology – As the Bundy family members were abused, cameras captured it. Not television network cameras, but dozens of cell phone video devices that gave witness to a Bundy aunt being shoved to the ground, and a Bundy son being tazed. All of this while threatening protestors with dogs, brandished weapons and vehicles was captured, uploaded and made viral to the watching world.
     
  2. States' rights – As the drama unfolded it became clear that the governor of Nevada, and the sheriff of Clark County knew that Cliven Bundy's family had not only not broken any state law regarding the land, but that they had gone to the nth degree to ensure compliance with Nevada laws on the property. The governor and the sheriff, to their credit, did not favor the feds as a more powerful party in the conflict. Though there must have been pressure from Senator Reid's office, the administration via the Bureau of Land Management, and local officials who were bought and sold like the Clark County commissioner who told those coming to support the Bundys to have "funeral plans in place."
     
  3. Grassroots response – As other incidents have transpired in the past, the amount of time it took honest information to reach the grassroots and thus the response to the action came too slow. In the massacre in Waco, most of the nation had been sold a single narrative from the limited media outlets covering the events. Similarly the events surrounding the abduction of Elian Gonzales from his family in Florida and deportation to Cuba took place in such a response vacuum that by the time Americans knew the real story, the damage was done. With the Bundy ranch, Internet outlets by the dozen had competing information with the limited "official news" being released by the networks, and in most cases the alternative sources had it correct and usually a full day or so ahead of the news cycle. By the time afternoon drive hit, when the network news rooms in New York were preparing their first stories, talk radio audiences had already been dialing their elected officials in Washington demanding action.
The majority of Americans saw through the efforts to spin the story in Nevada. Couple that with the leadership failures that the American people view the administration responsible for, from Benghazi to the Affordable Care Act, all it took was the unedited video of federal agents tazing Bundy's son, followed by his pulling the wires from his chest and continuing to stand his ground for there to be comparisons made to the American revolution.
It's also important to note that merely pulling back from the Bundy property hasn't settled the matter for the American people either.
The feds have stolen 352 head of cattle, and will not confirm or deny if they euthanized some or all of them. Recompense must be made. And to be candid, I wouldn't be a bit surprised to see if a few ambitious law firms don't try to convince the Bundy family of the validity of litigation.
Fortunately for the American people, the feds were not able to ultimately bully a simple rancher, not for a tortoise, a solar power plant, or a dirty senator and his administration.
We owe the Bundy family a great deal of thanks for standing tall.
For if the federal government is allowed to do it with one, then there will be nothing stopping them from doing it again.