Common Sense Commentary: In my humble but studied opinion, Michele Bachmann may be exactly right when she suggests that, because of this new, pacifistic, Obama/Kerry deal with Iran, Israel may be forced to preempt Iran's nuclear capability, since Iran has long called for and aggressively sought the annihilation of the State of Israel, and will surely use nuclear power to accomplish that end the day they are able to do so. If you had a neighbor who had a long history of violence and murder, who kept throwing rocks, setting fires and shooting at your house while continually threatening to burn it down while your family sleeps, and the legal authorities or police agencies wouldn't do anything about it, at least you would have the option of moving. Israel doesn't have that option. If any man has that kind of neighbor, he had better take preemptive measures before he and his family are all burned alive. Legal action, after the fact, won't help that murdered family or the nation of Israel if they are dead. The ironic thing is, Armageddon, when God's timing arrives, will happen whether it is ignited because of international accommodation and acquiescence to Islam's aggression against Israel, or because Israel neutralizes Iran with nuclear weapons and that sets off an Islamic attempt at a second holocaust. Either way, the Armageddon battle will be fought and won by Israel, as prophesied in Rev.16:12-21. This will take place around Tel Magiddo in the Valley of Jezreel, where more battles have been fought than any other spot on earth, just south of Nazareth. And, by the way, Michele Bachmann is a committed Christian and a primary founder of the Tea Party. RB
Bachmann On Obama/Kerry
Deal With Iran ...........
ARMAGEDDON
From World Net Daily
Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., cut straight to the heart of the matter when  WND asked her what the nuclear deal with Iran will mean.
“The major nations of the world have chosen to fail to thwart Iran from  gaining a nuclear weapon. It is a blunder of such great proportion, history will  record it’s folly,” she ruefully predicted.
 
The congresswoman had an equally dire assessment when asked: Did the deal  mean Israel would now have no option but to launch a preemptive strike on Iran  to stop it from acquiring nuclear weapons?
Israel may have ‘to save the world’
“Now Israel must secure not only her destiny, but she may have to save the  world from an Islamic-inspired nuclear Armageddon,” she observed ominously.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the deal brokered by world  powers over the weekend a “historic mistake.”
“Iran gets billions of dollars in sanction relief without paying an actual  price,” said the prime minister. “Iran gets written permission to breach U.N.  Security Council resolutions.”
The deal, spearheaded by U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, will ease strict  economic sanctions on Iran in exchange for steps supposed to curb the nation’s  nuclear program.
Netanyahu had insisted, to be effective in stopping Iran’s drive to build  atomic weapons, any deal had to end Iran’s enriching of uranium and include the  demolition of a plutonium reactor under construction.
‘Surrender by the United States’
But an 
Associated  Press analysis showed the Israelis’ worst fears were realized because the  deal does not do either of those things and “relies heavily on Iranian  goodwill.”
Former U.S. ambassador to the U.N. 
John  Bolton called the deal an “abject surrender by the United States” because  “Iran retains its full capacity to enrich uranium, thus abandoning a decade of  Western insistence and Security Council resolutions that Iran stop all  uranium-enrichment activities.”
He warned, “Iran may have gained all of the time it needs to achieve  weaponization not of simply a handful of nuclear weapons, but of dozens or  more.”
Bachmann wrote an op-ed in the Jerusalem Post earlier this month that  questioned the president’s entire approach to the Mideast, noting Obama recently  told the U.N. General Assembly that “Israel’s security as a Jewish and  democratic state depends upon the realization of a Palestinian state” rather  than neutralizing the threat from Iran.
Read more at 
http://www.wnd.com/2013/11/bachmann-israel-may-have-to-save-world-from-armageddon/#gyLkMIdX28L4VvUa.99
Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., cut straight to the heart of the matter when  WND asked her what the nuclear deal with Iran will mean.
“The major nations of the world have chosen to fail to thwart Iran from  gaining a nuclear weapon. It is a blunder of such great proportion, history will  record it’s folly,” she ruefully predicted.
 
The congresswoman had an equally dire assessment when asked: Did the deal  mean Israel would now have no option but to launch a preemptive strike on Iran  to stop it from acquiring nuclear weapons?
Israel may have ‘to save the world’
“Now Israel must secure not only her destiny, but she may have to save the  world from an Islamic-inspired nuclear Armageddon,” she observed ominously.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the deal brokered by world  powers over the weekend a “historic mistake.”
“Iran gets billions of dollars in sanction relief without paying an actual  price,” said the prime minister. “Iran gets written permission to breach U.N.  Security Council resolutions.”
The deal, spearheaded by U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, will ease strict  economic sanctions on Iran in exchange for steps supposed to curb the nation’s  nuclear program.
Netanyahu had insisted, to be effective in stopping Iran’s drive to build  atomic weapons, any deal had to end Iran’s enriching of uranium and include the  demolition of a plutonium reactor under construction.
‘Surrender by the United States’
But an 
Associated  Press analysis showed the Israelis’ worst fears were realized because the  deal does not do either of those things and “relies heavily on Iranian  goodwill.”
Former U.S. ambassador to the U.N. 
John  Bolton called the deal an “abject surrender by the United States” because  “Iran retains its full capacity to enrich uranium, thus abandoning a decade of  Western insistence and Security Council resolutions that Iran stop all  uranium-enrichment activities.”
He warned, “Iran may have gained all of the time it needs to achieve  weaponization not of simply a handful of nuclear weapons, but of dozens or  more.”
Bachmann wrote an op-ed in the Jerusalem Post earlier this month that  questioned the president’s entire approach to the Mideast, noting Obama recently  told the U.N. General Assembly that “Israel’s security as a Jewish and  democratic state depends upon the realization of a Palestinian state” rather  than neutralizing the threat from Iran.
Read more at 
http://www.wnd.com/2013/11/bachmann-israel-may-have-to-save-world-from-armageddon/#gyLkMIdX28L4VvUa.99
Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., cut straight to the heart of the matter when  WND asked her what the nuclear deal with Iran will mean.
“The major nations of the world have chosen to fail to thwart Iran from  gaining a nuclear weapon. It is a blunder of such great proportion, history will  record it’s folly,” she ruefully predicted.
 
The congresswoman had an equally dire assessment when asked: Did the deal  mean Israel would now have no option but to launch a preemptive strike on Iran  to stop it from acquiring nuclear weapons?
Israel may have ‘to save the world’
“Now Israel must secure not only her destiny, but she may have to save the  world from an Islamic-inspired nuclear Armageddon,” she observed ominously.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the deal brokered by world  powers over the weekend a “historic mistake.”
“Iran gets billions of dollars in sanction relief without paying an actual  price,” said the prime minister. “Iran gets written permission to breach U.N.  Security Council resolutions.”
The deal, spearheaded by U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, will ease strict  economic sanctions on Iran in exchange for steps supposed to curb the nation’s  nuclear program.
Netanyahu had insisted, to be effective in stopping Iran’s drive to build  atomic weapons, any deal had to end Iran’s enriching of uranium and include the  demolition of a plutonium reactor under construction.
‘Surrender by the United States’
But an 
Associated  Press analysis showed the Israelis’ worst fears were realized because the  deal does not do either of those things and “relies heavily on Iranian  goodwill.”
Former U.S. ambassador to the U.N. 
John  Bolton called the deal an “abject surrender by the United States” because  “Iran retains its full capacity to enrich uranium, thus abandoning a decade of  Western insistence and Security Council resolutions that Iran stop all  uranium-enrichment activities.”
He warned, “Iran may have gained all of the time it needs to achieve  weaponization not of simply a handful of nuclear weapons, but of dozens or  more.”
Bachmann wrote an op-ed in the Jerusalem Post earlier this month that  questioned the president’s entire approach to the Mideast, noting Obama recently  told the U.N. General Assembly that “Israel’s security as a Jewish and  democratic state depends upon the realization of a Palestinian state” rather  than neutralizing the threat from Iran.
Read more at 
http://www.wnd.com/2013/11/bachmann-israel-may-have-to-save-world-from-armageddon/#gyLkMIdX28L4VvUa.99
Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., cut straight to the heart of the matter when  WND asked her what the nuclear deal with Iran will mean.
“The major nations of the world have chosen to fail to thwart Iran from  gaining a nuclear weapon. It is a blunder of such great proportion, history will  record it’s folly,” she ruefully predicted.
 
The congresswoman had an equally dire assessment when asked: Did the deal  mean Israel would now have no option but to launch a preemptive strike on Iran  to stop it from acquiring nuclear weapons?
Israel may have ‘to save the world’
“Now Israel must secure not only her destiny, but she may have to save the  world from an Islamic-inspired nuclear Armageddon,” she observed ominously.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the deal brokered by world  powers over the weekend a “historic mistake.”
“Iran gets billions of dollars in sanction relief without paying an actual  price,” said the prime minister. “Iran gets written permission to breach U.N.  Security Council resolutions.”
The deal, spearheaded by U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, will ease strict  economic sanctions on Iran in exchange for steps supposed to curb the nation’s  nuclear program.
Netanyahu had insisted, to be effective in stopping Iran’s drive to build  atomic weapons, any deal had to end Iran’s enriching of uranium and include the  demolition of a plutonium reactor under construction.
‘Surrender by the United States’
But an 
Associated  Press analysis showed the Israelis’ worst fears were realized because the  deal does not do either of those things and “relies heavily on Iranian  goodwill.”
Former U.S. ambassador to the U.N. 
John  Bolton called the deal an “abject surrender by the United States” because  “Iran retains its full capacity to enrich uranium, thus abandoning a decade of  Western insistence and Security Council resolutions that Iran stop all  uranium-enrichment activities.”
He warned, “Iran may have gained all of the time it needs to achieve  weaponization not of simply a handful of nuclear weapons, but of dozens or  more.”
Bachmann wrote an op-ed in the Jerusalem Post earlier this month that  questioned the president’s entire approach to the Mideast, noting Obama recently  told the U.N. General Assembly that “Israel’s security as a Jewish and  democratic state depends upon the realization of a Palestinian state” rather  than neutralizing the threat from Iran.
Read more at 
http://www.wnd.com/2013/11/bachmann-israel-may-have-to-save-world-from-armageddon/#gyLkMIdX28L4VvUa.99