So what's new on the "Commander in Chief's" birth certificate?
We know the opposition political parties, and the press, know all about this. The press love him, so they are whistling through the graveyard pretending it isn't there and hoping to figure out a way to save their Savior. But why aren't the other parties exposing this heinous conspiracy ... if it is true? Even if it is true, if I were running the show, I would do exactly what they are doing at this point in time.... nothing .... until it is too late for him to resign leaving us with Hillary. Why not Biden? His electability is zero but Hilliary is shown to be electable in recent polls. Actually, Republican John Boehner , as House Speaker, is next in the line of succession after Biden. If he turned down the "opportunity" to be President of Mission Impossible for a month or so, everyone else in a long list of succession are Dems and read like a rogues gallery or roll call at a Super-max Prison. After Boehner is Dem. President of the Senate (pro tem) Daniel Inouye but the Dems would insist on Hillary who is next on the list....so Inouye would bow out.... if they are so dumb to want the job at all for the following four worst years in our history. But Hillary is trembling with desire for the Devil can't corner ya "Round Room" and could look good from appointment to election day and would likely win with Bill as First Husband. One can only imagine that strange scenario. You can't make this stuff up. Whoever is elected, in less than a year from today, will be voted out at the end of his/her 4 year term. Why? Because no one but God can stop what has become a runaway, political/Wall Street, corruption train going down this near vertical Mountain of trouble. Whoever it is, they will have to cut budgets to the bone ...and scrape the bone ... including the most sacrosanct programs, hurt every body's feelings, and not solve the unsolvable problems... plus dragging their whole party down the tube. Everyone running for that job is either mentally unbalanced or a super patriot who believes in miracles. So, if two or three of them are the latter, I love and pray for them ... because, as I said, "only God ... can kick that can between the goal posts." What a wonderful and amazing time to be standing on this ringie, mountain, railroad track ...at night... a heavenly light coming my way with a glorious roar like...like a speeding train. But I now it is simply destiny.... history ... His story..... Merry Christmas to all and to all a good night. RB
Here it is ......
E-mail "drive by" making the rounds: I didn't originate this.It begins with a question.RB
--- Why doesn’t Congress pursue this? They want their nose in everything else.. We could get the guy impeached, before he totally destroys our country and way of life..
New twist on Birth Certificate issue
Most interesting, and with verification links provided.
I'd say it deserves to be put into the light for questioning!
Sent by Korean War Vet, author, Degree in History.
New twist on Birth Certificate issue
It was brought to light that back in 1961 people of color were called 'Negroes.'
So how can this 'birth certificate' state he is 'African-American' when the term wasn't even used back then?? This isn't over! This is interesting!
Here is a comment from a reader to George Ure at Urban Survival.com :
"As you all know, Donald Trump made a big deal about Obama's birth certificate.
I will tell you right now that I had never given this "birther" issue any credit. I watched the hype and the crazies come out. I completely dismissed the entire
ordeal altogether.
In fact, it was not until the White House released the birth certificate that it had gained my attention. I am the studious sort of guy, and I have plenty of time on my hands. So, I took a close look at this document.
While I would have thought that this issue would have been closed for good (and, got the crazies to crawl back into their holes), I found two extremely strange inconsistencies that merit some attention.
First of all, the birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's birth as August 4, 1961. It also lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right? At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama's father was born in "Kenya, East Africa".
This wouldn't seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth, and 27 years after his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet exist?
Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the "British East Africa Protectorate". But, this is not the only thing that I found that just does not jive.
The second item that I looked into was the hospital that Obama was born in. On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is
"Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital".
This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called "Kaui KeolaniKapi'olani Maternity Home", respectively.
The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the
hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978?
Go ahead, look it up. I am not talking crazy talk....these are the facts. Like I said, I thought that this was a non-issue until the actual certificate was released. Now that it has been released, of course I had to look into it. I have found these issues, now I know that something is up. If you doubt me, just look at the following resources:
Sure as heck, the hospital part is true, as you can read about the 1978 merger here.
http://www.kapiolani.org/women-and-children/about-us/default.aspx
Post-colonial history (from Wikipedia)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Kenya
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya
The first direct elections for Africans to the Legislative Council took place in 1957.
Despite British hopes of handing power to "moderate" African rivals, it was the Kenya African National Union (KANU) of Jomo Kenyatta that formed a government shortly before Kenya became independent on 12 December 1963, on the same day forming the first Constitution of Kenya.
"In God We Trust" Remember to remember that.
New twist on Birth Certificate issue
Most interesting, and with verification links provided.
I'd say it deserves to be put into the light for questioning!
Sent by Korean War Vet, author, Degree in History.
New twist on Birth Certificate issue
It was brought to light that back in 1961 people of color were called 'Negroes.'
So how can this 'birth certificate' state he is 'African-American' when the term wasn't even used back then?? This isn't over! This is interesting!
Here is a comment from a reader to George Ure at Urban Survival.com :
"As you all know, Donald Trump made a big deal about Obama's birth certificate.
I will tell you right now that I had never given this "birther" issue any credit. I watched the hype and the crazies come out. I completely dismissed the entire
ordeal altogether.
In fact, it was not until the White House released the birth certificate that it had gained my attention. I am the studious sort of guy, and I have plenty of time on my hands. So, I took a close look at this document.
While I would have thought that this issue would have been closed for good (and, got the crazies to crawl back into their holes), I found two extremely strange inconsistencies that merit some attention.
First of all, the birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's birth as August 4, 1961. It also lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right? At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama's father was born in "Kenya, East Africa".
This wouldn't seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth, and 27 years after his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet exist?
Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the "British East Africa Protectorate". But, this is not the only thing that I found that just does not jive.
The second item that I looked into was the hospital that Obama was born in. On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is
"Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital".
This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called "Kaui KeolaniKapi'olani Maternity Home", respectively.
The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the
hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978?
Go ahead, look it up. I am not talking crazy talk....these are the facts. Like I said, I thought that this was a non-issue until the actual certificate was released. Now that it has been released, of course I had to look into it. I have found these issues, now I know that something is up. If you doubt me, just look at the following resources:
Sure as heck, the hospital part is true, as you can read about the 1978 merger here.
http://www.kapiolani.org/women-and-children/about-us/default.aspx
Post-colonial history (from Wikipedia)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Kenya
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya
The first direct elections for Africans to the Legislative Council took place in 1957.
Despite British hopes of handing power to "moderate" African rivals, it was the Kenya African National Union (KANU) of Jomo Kenyatta that formed a government shortly before Kenya became independent on 12 December 1963, on the same day forming the first Constitution of Kenya.
"In God We Trust" Remember to remember that.
No comments:
Post a Comment