Common Sense Commentary: When the Majestic, Scientific Nobles decreed the Big Bang theory as the absolute cause of the existence of our Universe, the Major News Media rejoiced, recorded it, repeated it and reinforced it until millions of their fellow human doubters swallowed it whole, bone, hyde, hair and all. But, alas, those pseudo "scientific" evolutionists have been adjusting their theory as to how we and the Universe came to be, constantly. They have changed the mechanics of exactly how it happened time and time again. They just knew it didn't ride in on a turtle, but there was no other option for an atheist. What evolutionists were so certain of when Darwin first presented his theory, as fact, in the early 1830's has been adjusted, rewritten, corrected and its holes patched over and over again like a Model T Ford inner tube. Evolution, and its cousin, the Big Bang theory, have been ballooning out of the weak spots of a threadbare old tire, expectant of a convincing, missing link at any moment, for years. Now, finally, they are confessing that the Universal Big Bang fallacy they theorized as a small, tight dot in space, which exploded stars and planets outward as fragments or shrapnel from a bomb explosion, didn't happen. Desperate to find an answer which harmonized with their foundational, evolutionary theory underneath it, their knowso imagination knew no bounds. The Big Bang Explosion theory, which was supposed to be their final explanation of the origin of the Universe, has now fizzled down to an inaudible puff of hot air. Now the evolutionist's best efforts to solve the riddle, retreats to the more durable certainty that the Universe is "infinite" .... as in.... "Its always been here". That's their best guess yet and leaves them nowhere else to go but to a Creator. They are now backed up to an infinite black hole just over their "superior intellect's" cliff's edge ... staring into the mysterious abyss of the universe's visible, obvious existence.
I didn't know CBS has a "DC" version of the news. But it doesn't surprise me considering DC's primary products ... Universal sized egos, Supreme Deity complexes, Half-wit realities and Obese consumption appetites. In the article below, all of the bold type, red type and underlines are mine, not part of the article, but are my emphasis and comments. RB
Study: Universe May Have Had No Beginning At All
WASHINGTON (CBS DC) — Big Bang? What Big Bang? In a new theory, researchers suggest that the start of the universe may have involved no bang at all. “Our theory suggests that the age of the universe could be infinite,” study co-author Saurya Das, a theoretical physicist at the University
of Lethbridge in Alberta, Canada, told LiveScience. (I dearly love the Evolutionist's "scientific" use of their absolute certainty terms such as, "it may have been, theory suggests, and it could be". RB)
In 1929, Edwin Hubble came to the conclusion that “there must have been an instant in time when the entire Universe was contained in a single point in space. The Universe must have been born in this single violent event.” This is what became known the Big Bang theory, NASA explains. ("the entire Universe contained is a single point in space...got born in a single instant". That explanation is even more miraculous than creation by God. I call it the Single Pencil Point, Universal "Dot" Explosion Theory. No wonder they want to be rid of it. RB)
The formulation brings up two major points. First, that the universe possibly had no beginning which involved an infinitely small and infinitely dense point of matter. Second, that more information could be discovered on the make-up of dark matter. Dark matter is the substance that makes up most of the universe, and up until now has remained somewhat mysterious. ("somewhat" understates the mystery of a creation without a Creator by a trillion light years. RB).
The Big Bang theory, which speculates that the universe was born 13.8 billion years ago, comes from Einstein’s general theory of relatively. And according to these equations, all matter in the universe was once in a single point. (They had to change it because they couldn't explain where that "single point" and that "space" came from. The only "Big Bang", from a "single point", there may have been was when God said, "Let there be". That may have caused a Big Bang from a single point. RB).
Robert Brandenberger, a theoretical cosmologist at McGill University in Montreal, says that, even though, there are holes in Einstein’s theory, scientists continue to work as if the equations still hold. (How can "holes in a theory" "still hold true" in "scientists work" RB)
“So when we say that the universe begins with a big bang, we really have no right to say that,” Brandenberger told LiveScience. ( A glimmer of truth breaks through an evolutionist's thought process. RB).
The two most commonly accepted theories, quantum mechanics and general relativity, are actually at odds with each other and both theories fail to explain dark matter. (Don't you just love it when leading evolutionists admit, after years of unwavering certainty, that their "two most accepted theories ... are actually at odds with each other". RB).
To investigate further, Das and his colleagues looked at an older way of visualizing quantum mechanics and were then able to provide a way to calculate the trajectory of a particle. After applying this older form of quantum theory to Einstein’s theory, they took a look at what would happen in deep time. (So now they are backtracking to "older" theories to explain origins? Sounds like they are running out of theories.)
“One way to test the theory is to look at how dark matter is distributed in the universe and see if it matches the properties of the proposed superfluid… If our results match with those, even approximately, that’s great,” Das told LiveScience. ("approximately" fits in the same classification as the above "theoretical, suggests that, must have been, may have been and could have been" designations.... Uncertain, unsure, indefinite guesses. RB)
Brandenburg explained that there is no doubt whether there was a hot fireball at very early times, but problems arise when describing it as a singularity. (Yes, with a "fireball" core in the earth and "hot fireball" stars throughout the Universe, nobody argues against "fireballs" and there is "no doubt" they are "hot". as Dr. Brandenburg says. But even with that, he pulls out his parachute and opens his escape hatch with this ... "but problems arise".... RB)
No comments:
Post a Comment