My un-named Internet friend, in high places, who is quite a word-master, gives this bit of logical wisdom to the Wikileaks debate....
A properly functioning government has to have strategic secrets to deal with external threats. To compromise that is treasonous. But when the biggest secrets surround its own corruption, cover ups, malfeasance and abuse of its own constituency then I'd say the contract is broken and at some tipping point exposing it may be considered a constitutional duty.... uphold against all threats foreign and domestic, right? Of course if the motivation is political then that pollutes the whole argument...
Truth is treason in the empire of lies.
_____________________________________
So, no, he is not an American, not a Republican, not a Conservative, and not a lover of Donald Trump. He seems only an exposer of corrupt politicians of whatever country, party, sex, race, creed or color. He is hated by politicians out of fear and the world's Major News Networks for upstaging them and revealing ugly secrets they do their best to cover up, for their friends. Anyone hated by Obama, Hillary and Soros can't be all wrong. They have, with international and media help, accused Assange of every kind of crime and deviation possible and will eventually kill or imprison him. They are putting immense pressure on Ecuador to kick Assange out of their London embassy so he can be arrested and prosecuted. RB
Dominie Bush posted this comment to my post above. RB
Dominie Bush Many email systems use a verification system called DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) that shows whether an email has been changed. It uses a key stored on the email server that sent the email, so that it can’t be forged. Hillary Clinton's website uses gmail. The emails revealed by Assange had not been tampered with. Donna Brazile was wrong: http://dailycaller.com/.../heres-cryptographic-proof.../
Dominie Bush posted this comment to my post above. RB
Dominie Bush Many email systems use a verification system called DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) that shows whether an email has been changed. It uses a key stored on the email server that sent the email, so that it can’t be forged. Hillary Clinton's website uses gmail. The emails revealed by Assange had not been tampered with. Donna Brazile was wrong: http://dailycaller.com/.../heres-cryptographic-proof.../
No comments:
Post a Comment