Virginia Governor Votes To Kill Babies But Is Condemned For A Picture Of Black Face

How Far Off Road Can A Dumbuggie Go ?

It seems the Democrat Governor of Virginia has suddenly revealed himself to be a lightening rod on a political mountain, atop a tall medal tower, with his head in the clouds and his mouth open. First he defiantly defended the pending bill, in Virginia, to allow abortions right up to the minute before birth, which drew a thunder storm of Conservative abhorrence, and caused the Liberal News Media and Democrats, in fear of their true agenda being exposed, criticized him in a whisper for saying it out loud. 

Then, before the day ended, someone released pictures of the Governor, 25 years ago, in his year-book. On the same page was someone in "black face" next to some other clueless college kid in a KKK sheet. Though the Liberal News Media and Democrats obviously thought little about extending legal abortions right up to birth, they literally exploded in hatred that of the Governor that, in his mindless late teens, he had a picture of a blackened face standing next to someone in kkk dress, in some kind of college skit. He claims he wasn't behind that black face but that he did once blacken his face in a Michael Jackson dance contest. Nobody thought much about "black face comedy" in years past, and a lot of ordinary people did it. But today, just having a picture of it in an old year book, has become, to half the nation, a far worse sin than murdering a baby the hour before it is born. Both are wrong, but cold blooded murder draws execution in God's Law Book, the Ten Commandments ... but "blackening you face" isn't mentioned anywhere in the Bible. If blackening your face has any sin related to it, it would be in the contemptuous attitude of the play actor.

Black face is wrong, and though innocuous, it is a thoughtless insult to a race of people to make mock or make fun of them. Dressing up like a Mexican with the big, straw hat and lazing in the shade is the same kind of thing. It shouldn't be done and those who callously do it reveal far more about themselves than those they stereotype.

However, abortion is not a lesser transgression than black face, or even racial hatred. It is murder and becomes more obviously so with New York's new law, and Virginia's pending law, of making abortion, especially up to and during delivery, legal. The most vile abortionist knows that is murder of the baby.

__________________________________________

National Review Reports On The Issue

Northam on Late-Term-Abortion Remarks: ‘I Don’t Have Any Regrets’

Virginia governor Ralph Northam on Thursday stood by his prior defense of late-term-abortion legislation pending in the Virginia state legislature, telling reporters that he doesn’t regret the comments.

“I’m a physician. I’m also the governor. But when I’m asked questions, a lot of times it is put in the context of being a physician — realizing how we approach, how we manage patients, how we offer advice and counseling,” he said at a press conference. “So, no, I don’t have any regrets.”

Asked Wednesday about Democratic Virginia delegate Kathy Tran’s admission that her bill would allow for abortions to be performed up until the point of birth, Northam defended the legislation and suggested that women should be able to determine whether their born-alive infant should receive life-saving care.

___________________________

Mind you, the Main Street Media and Democrats slipped right past the Governor's defence of abortion, right up to the birth of a baby, but they immediately went berserk about an old picture of the Governor on his same year-book page as the black face and KKK depiction which, in fact was a college skit of dumb comedy in his early years.  I do not defend him for putting the pictures on his page, he shouldn't have, even 25 years ago, but his defence of last minute abortions for Virginia is inexcusable, and he should step down for that ... not the stupid, old picture. His Democrat friends obviously want him gone for the picture. This hullabaloo really shows how out of focus and disoriented Liberals have become.

The biggest, most extreme contradiction, next to the Crucifixion of the totally innocent Jesus Christ, is that, today, the same people, who support the murder of innocence by aborting babies, also loudly and violently oppose the Capital Punishment of the most vile and guilty murderers. Whereas God defends innocents and condemns guilt. It is a devilish contradiction of good and evil. Also, those same people support abortion during delivery of a healthy baby while objecting to the eradication of a harmful insect.

_______________________

Here is an example from Christian Headlines

Legislator Filed ‘Abortion during Delivery’ and Pro-Caterpillar Bills on the Same Day

The same Virginia legislator who filed a bill this year that would have allowed abortion during a woman’s delivery also filed a bill to prohibit the targeting a certain type of caterpillar by pesticides.

The bills were filed the same day .... B 2491 by Del. Kathy Tran would have eliminated many of the restrictions on late-term abortion and even would have permitted an abortion while a woman was dilated and in delivery, as Christian Headlines previously reported.  That bill was filed Jan. 9, the same day she filed HB 2495, which pertained to the fall cankerworm. Specifically, it would have prohibited “localities from spraying pesticides intended to suppress an infestation of the fall cankerworm during the period between March 1 and August 1.”

The fall cankerworm is a caterpillar pest that can devastate trees. Pro-lifers on social media said the contrast between the two bills was striking.  “Save the Cankerworm. Destroy a full-term baby. Thank goodness the VA GOP legislators stopped this madness,” Terry Lathan, the chairwoman of the Alabama Republican Party, wrote on Twitter.  

Under questioning this week, Tran admitted that her first bill would allow have allowed abortion up to the moment of delivery.The committee chairman asked her: “Where it's obvious that a woman is about to give birth – she has physical signs that she's about to give birth. Would that still be a point at which she could request an abortion? … She's dilating.”“Mr. Chairman,” Tran responded, “that would be a decision that the doctor –  the physician – and the women would make at that point.“I understand that,” the chairman said. “I'm asking if your bill allows that.” “My bill would allow that. Yes,” Tran answered.