Jan 17, 2018

Questions Which Test Your Honesty Not Your Intelligence

Well ... maybe both ...

Liberals have a genius for twisting their own crooked snakes' rattles off, laying the benign appeqring snakes, stunned but angry, out flat in the public's path, uncoiled, unslithering and calling them straight arrows, pointing the way to Nirvana. It isn't that Democrats don't know their leaders and stars are lying, to a cyanide degree, they just don't give a hoot and even prefer lies because the truth exposes them for what they are. Not just greedy but habitual,poisonous liars too. RB

The kind of questions Liberals hate and change the subject to Bush and Nixon, when asked.

1- Since only 10 million people have Obamacare, how will 24 million people die if it is repealed? Will 14 million people be randomly shot? 

2- If Donald Trump deleted all of his emails, wiped his server with Bleach and destroyed all of his phones with a hammer, would the Mainstream Media suddenly lose all interest in the story and declare him innocent? 

3- If women do the same job for less money, why do companies hire men to do the same job for more money? 

4- If you rob a bank in a Sanctuary City, is it illegal or is it just an Undocumented Withdrawal? 

5- Each ISIS attack now is a reaction to Trump policies, but all ISIS attacks during Obama's term were due to Climate Change and a plea for jobs. 

6- After the London 'Lone Wolf' terrorist attack government officials have arrested at least eight other 'Lone Wolves' who had conspired with the original 'Lone Wolf' in planning the 'Lone Wolf' attack. Even though all involved are Muslims, you can be assured, the 'Lone Wolf attack has nothing at all to do with Islam, just like the other 1000 plus 'Lone Wolf' attacks by Muslims are completely unassociated with Islam. 

7- We should stop calling them all 'Entitlements'. Welfare, Food Stamps, WIC, are not entitlements. They are taxpayer-funded handouts, and shouldn't be called entitlements at all.. Social Security and Veterans Benefits are Entitlements because the people receiving them are entitled to them. They were earned and paid for by the recipients. 

8- If Muslims want to run away from a Muslim country, does that mean they're Islamophobic? 

9- If Liberals don't believe in biological gender then why did they march for women's rights? 

10- How did the Russians get Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the DNC to steal the Primary from Bernie Sanders? How did Russia get Donna Brazile to leak debate questions to Hillary Clinton in advance of the debates? 

11- Why is it that Democrats think Superdelegates are fine, but they have a problem with the Electoral College? 

12- If you don't want the FBI involved in elections, don't nominate someone who's being investigated by the FBI. 

13- If Hillary's speeches cost $250,000 an hour, how come no one shows up to her free ones? 

14- The DNC is mad at Russia because they 'think' they are trying to manipulate our election by exposing that the DNC is manipulating our election? 

15- Why is it that Liberals and the Media are upset about the words Trump used 11 years ago but they are alright with Adult men using the Ladies Room with your wife and children. 

By Elliott

Jan 16, 2018

I Wouldn't Have Chosen Trump As My Pastor...

Or my best friend or my daughter's husband ... 

But neither would I have chosen my coarse, Marine Regimental Commander, Colonel Chesty Puller, who probably saved my life in North Korea, for those holy positions. And neither would I have chosen Billy Graham to fill Chesty Pullers shoes. Billy couldn't have done Chesty's job. I doubt if any Democrat in America, or any of the other Republican candidates running for the office, could have accomplished what Trump has in his first year, or so aggravated the Socialist Commune, News Media, the RINO Republicans and the sordid, disreputable, noxious Democrats, as he has. There were only two of the Republicans worthy of the Presidency and Trump wasn't one of them, but he is the one God gave us and His plan and purposes are higher than mine. I have to agree with Evan Sayet, below, Trump dumbfounds most Congressmen, the News Media and half or most Americans. His abrasive nature turns a lot of people off ... but he is at least doing what needs done in Washington. For that I am grateful. RB

He Fights !


My Leftist friends (as well as many ardent #NeverTrumpers) constantly ask me if I’m not bothered by Donald Trump’s lack of decorum.  They ask if I don’t think his tweets are “beneath the dignity of the office.”  Here’s my answer: We Right-thinking people have tried dignity.  There could not have been a man of more quiet dignity than George W. Bush as he suffered the outrageous lies and politically motivated hatreds that undermined his presidency.  We tried statesmanship.  Could there be another human being on this earth who so desperately prized “collegiality” as John McCain?  We tried propriety – has there been a nicer human being ever than Mitt Romney?  And the results were always the same. This is because, while we were playing by the rules of dignity, collegiality and propriety, the Left has been, for the past 60 years, engaged in a knife fight where the only rules are those of Saul Alinsky and the Chicago mob. I don’t find anything “dignified,” “collegial” or “proper” about Barack Obama’s lying about what went down on the streets of Ferguson in order to ramp up racial hatreds because racial hatreds serve the Democratic Party.  I don’t see anything “dignified” in lying about the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi and imprisoning an innocent filmmaker to cover your tracks.  I don’t see anything “statesman-like” in weaponizing the IRS to be used to destroy your political opponents and any dissent.  Yes, Obama was “articulate” and “polished” but in no way was he in the least bit “dignified,” “collegial” or “proper.” 

The Left has been engaged in a war against America since the rise of the Children of the ‘60s.   To them, it has been an all-out war where nothing is held sacred and nothing is seen as beyond the pale.  It has been a war they’ve fought with violence, the threat of violence, demagoguery and lies from day one – the violent take-over of the universities – till today. The problem is that, through these years, the Left has been the only side fighting this war.  While the Left has been taking a knife to anyone who stands in their way, the Right has continued to act with dignity, collegiality and propriety. With Donald Trump, this all has come to an end.  Donald Trump is America’s first wartime president in the Culture War. During wartime, things like “dignity” and “collegiality” simply aren’t the most essential qualities one looks for in their warriors.  Ulysses Grant was a drunk whose behavior in peacetime might well have seen him drummed out of the Army for conduct unbecoming.  Had Abraham Lincoln applied the peacetime rules of propriety and booted Grant, the Democrats might well still be holding their slaves today.   Lincoln rightly recognized that, “I cannot spare this man.  He fights.” 

General George Patton was a vulgar-talking, SOB.  In peacetime, this might have seen him stripped of rank.  But, had Franklin Roosevelt applied the normal rules of decorum, then Hitler and the Socialists would barely be five decades into their thousand-year Reich. Trump is fighting.  And what’s particularly delicious is that, like Patton standing over the battlefield as his tanks obliterated Rommel’s, he’s shouting, “You magnificent bastards, I read your book!”  That is just the icing on the cake, but it’s wonderful to see that not only is Trump fighting, he’s defeating the Left using their own tactics. That book is Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals – a book so essential to the Liberals’ war against America that it is and was the playbook for the entire Obama administration and the subject of Hillary Clinton’s senior thesis.   It is a book of such pure evil, that, just as the rest of us would dedicate our book to those we most love or those to whom we are most indebted, Alinsky dedicated his book to Lucifer. 

Trump’s tweets may seem rash and unconsidered but, in reality, he is doing exactly what Alinsky suggested his followers do. First, instead of going after “the fake media” – and they are so fake that they have literally gotten every single significant story of the past 60 years not just wrong, but diametrically opposed to the truth, from the Tet Offensive to Benghazi, to what really happened on the streets of Ferguson, Missouri – Trump isolated CNN.  He made it personal.  Then, just as Alinsky suggests, he employs ridicule which Alinsky described as “the most powerful weapon of all.” Everyone gets that it’s not just CNN – in fact, in a world where Al Sharpton and Rachel Maddow, Paul Krugman and Nicholas Kristof are people of influence and whose “reporting” is in no way significantly different than CNN’s – CNN is just a piker. 

Most importantly, Trump’s tweets have put CNN in an untenable and unwinnable position.  With Trump’s ability to go around them, they cannot simply stand pat.  They need to respond.  This leaves them with only two choices. They can either “go high” (as Hillary would disingenuously declare of herself and the fake news would disingenuously report as the truth) and begin to honestly and accurately report the news or they can double-down on their usual tactics and hope to defeat Trump with twice their usual hysteria and demagoguery. The problem for CNN (et al.) with the former is that, if they were to start honestly reporting the news, that would be the end of the Democratic Party they serve.  It is nothing but the incessant use of fake news (read: propaganda) that keeps the Left alive. Imagine, for example, if CNN had honestly and accurately reported then-candidate Barack Obama’s close ties to foreign terrorists (Rashid Khalidi), domestic terrorists (William Ayers), the mafia (Tony Rezko) or the true evils of his spiritual mentor, Jeremiah Wright’s, church. Imagine if they had honestly and accurately conveyed the evils of the Obama administration’s weaponizing of the IRS to be used against their political opponents or his running of guns to the Mexican cartels or the truth about the murder of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and the Obama administration’s cover-up. This makes “going high” a non-starter for CNN.  This leaves them no other option but to ratchet up the fake news, conjuring up the next “nothing burger” and devoting 24 hours a day to hysterical rants about how it’s “worse than Nixon.” This, obviously, is what CNN has chosen to do.  The problem is that, as they become more and more hysterical, they become more and more obvious.  Each new effort at even faker news than before and faker “outrage” only makes that much more clear to any objective observer that Trump is and always has been right about the fake news media. And, by causing their hysteria, Trump has forced them into numerous, highly embarrassing and discrediting mistakes.   Thus, in their desperation, they have lowered their standards even further and run with articles so clearly fake that, even with the liberal (lower case “l”) libel laws protecting the media, they’ve had to wholly retract and erase their stories repeatedly. Their flailing at Trump has even seen them cross the line into criminality, with CNN using their vast corporate fortune to hunt down a private citizen for having made fun of them in an Internet meme.  This threat to “dox” – release of personal information to encourage co-ideologists to visit violence upon him and his family -- a political satirist was chilling in that it clearly wasn’t meant just for him.  If it were, there would have been no reason for CNN to have made their “deal” with him public. Instead, CNN – playing by “Chicago Rules” – was sending a message to any and all: dissent will not be tolerated. This heavy-handed and hysterical response to a joke on the Internet has backfired on CNN, giving rise to only more righteous ridicule. So, to my friends on the Left – and the #NeverTrumpers as well -- do I wish we lived in a time when our president could be “collegial” and “dignified” and “proper”?  Of course I do.   These aren’t those times.  This is war.  And it’s a war that the Left has been fighting  without opposition for the past 50 years. So, say anything you want about this president – I get it, he can be vulgar, he can be crude, he can be undignified at times.  I don’t care.  I can’t spare this man.  He fights. Evan Sayet is the author of The KinderGarden of Eden: How The Modern Liberal Thinks.  His lecture to the Heritage Foundation on this same topic remains, some ten years later, by far the single most viewed lecture in their history.  Evan can be reached at contactevansayet@gmail.com.

Jan 15, 2018

Weather Variation, Global Warming, Climate Change, Climate Crisis

God laughs derision at vain human imagination.

The weather "perversion" contradiction Al Gore originally conceived, he called "Global Warming". As time passed and historic cold records continued to make "Global Warming" look contradictory, he quietly began to change the name of his life's vocation to "Climate Change". Under that rug he could sweep all variations of weather, hot, warm, cool or cold, and always be right. "Climate Change" is what we have always had since Genesis one. As Gore once claimed to be the "inventor of the Internet", and now claims God's natural changes in weather patterns to be his own private means of becoming a millionaire author, movie maker, international Guru and weather prophet. To keep the momentum rolling down the climactic attack track, he now calls his original Global Warming and then Climate Change ..."Climate Crisis"... More intensity equals more public vexation equals more zealots equals more recognition equals more money. Where do the Democrats find all these champions of delusion to run their party and our nation? God deliver us from Democrat delusional hysteria and RINO Republican timidity.
"Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing? He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the LORD shall have them in derision." Psm.2:1&4.

Now get Gore's latest defiant contradiction of reality...

Al Gore: 
‘Bitter cold’ is ‘exactly what we should 
expect from the climate crisis(ie "Global Warming" RB) 
Former Vice President Al Gore has weighed in on the record cold and snow in the U.S. “It’s bitter cold in parts of the US, but climate scientist Dr. Michael Mann explains that’s exactly what we should expect from the climate crisis,” Gore wrote on January 4 on Twitter.
Gore linked to one of his organizations’ articles on the brutal winter weather written by Climategate professor Michael Mann: The Climate Reality Project: 
 In the Gore touted article, Mann linked the cold and “lots of snow” to “climate change.”

Gore’s Oscar-winning documentary An Inconvenient Truth did not warn of record cold and increasing snowfalls as a consequence of man-made global warming. And as recently as 2009, Gore was hyping the lack of snow as evidence for man-made global warming. Source: “Gore Reports Snow and Ice Across the World Vanishing Quickly.”

Other climate activists warned of less cold and snow as well.
But as the snow piled up, the climate change claims were adjusted and cold and snow was added to the list of things caused by “global warming.” See: Warmists Wheel Out “Record Cold Due To Global Warming” Argument Again

Predictions of less snow and less severe winters were hammered into the public by global warming scientists. But once that predictions failed to come true, the opposite of what they predicted instead became—what they expected. 
If “climate change” is causing record cold and snow, then it would stand to reason that Gore is suggesting that if the U.S. had ratified the UN’s Kyoto Protocol treaty on “global warming” back in the 1990’s — the winter of 2018 would have been warmer?
Reality Check: But scientists are not buying the claims of Gore and Mann and others linking the record cold and snow to “global warming.”
‘Insanity…It’s Witchcraft’ – Meteorologist Joe Bastardi on claims that cold & snow caused by ‘global warming’ – WeatherBell Meteorologist Joe Bastardi on January 4, 2018: “This is flat out insanity and deception now to tell the public that events that have occurred countless times before with no climate change attribution, is now just that, is not science, its witchcraft. NO PROOF AT ALL. Its climate ambulance chasing, nothing more.”
Bastardi added: “This has happened countless times before and it wasn’t global warming then and is not now. Solid use of past patterns predicted major early cold from OCTOBER! I have tweeted that dozens of times showing the analog years I used, No co2 then.”
Climatologist Dr. Roger Pielke Sr. also weighed in, explaining: “For those who claim USA/Canada nor’easter is stronger because of ‘global warming’, they apparently do not realize that it’s so strong because of especially strong horizontal temperature gradient in the troposphere. It ‘bombed’ because of unusually cold air!”
Update: Global Warming Is Not Causing Harsh Winter Weather – Daily Caller – Excerpts: Kevin Trenberth, a scientist with the National Center for Atmospheric Research, said “winter storms are a manifestation of winter, not climate change.” …
“Such claims make no sense and are inconsistent with observations and the best science,” University of Washington climatologist Cliff Mass said of claims made by Mann and others. “The frequency of cold waves have decreased during the past fifty years, not increased. That alone shows that such claims are baseless.” “And on a personal note, it is very disappointing that members of my profession are making such obviously bogus claims,” Mass said. “It hurts the science, it hurts the credibility of climate scientists, and weakens our ability to be taken seriously by society.” …
Every winter seems to reignite the global warming debate. Things got intense in 2014 when former White House science czar John Holdren put out a video where he claimed that year’s “polar vortex” was actually a sign of global warming. Holdren’s video was largely based on research by Rutgers University scientist Jennifer Francis, which claims that warming in the Arctic is making the jet stream more wobbly, making cold snaps and nor’easter storms more frequent. Holdren later admitted that his video was based on his “personal opinion” of the science, but the argument is still used every time cold Arctic air pours down through the lower 48 states.
Mann wrote that global warming may be “causing the jet stream to meander in a particular pattern” that causes cold spells in the eastern U.S. Mann suggested this pattern was being driven by “the dramatic loss of sea ice in the Arctic.” Yet, scientists aren’t sold on this theory. Mass noted how theoretical research shows the opposite happening, future warming would drive less undulation in the jet stream and heat up the area responsible for cold spells in the U.S. “Research documented in peer-reviewed journals has demonstrated that there is no evidence for their claims of increasing frequency of ‘lazy jet streams’ and blocking over time,” Mass said. “If you substantially warm the source region of cold air, cold waves will decline,” Mass said. A 2014 study led by Colorado State University climate scientist Elizabeth Barnes found no evidence to back up the theory that a lazy or wobbling jet stream was becoming more frequent. “There is much disagreement on whether we have already witnessed substantial impacts,” Barnes wrote in a Thursday blog post for the Climate Variability and Predictability program. …
Climatologist Judith Curry said the “bomb cyclone” currently hammering North America is nothing new. Those extra-tropical storms have undergone “bombogenesis,” or rapid intensification. “The term ‘bomb’ for such storms was coined almost 40 years ago by MIT’s Fred Sanders,” Curry told TheDCNF, “who spent much of his career studying such storms back when global warming most definitely was not a factor.” …
Curry said that while “warmer oceans can cause greater snowfall,” storm intensity is also influenced ” by the patterns of sea surface temperature not so much the average temperatures.” But Mann’s arguments are more based on expectations of what could happen with more warming, and have little to do with current trends in “bomb cyclones.” Weather.us meteorologist Ryan Maue, an expert on cyclones, pointed out there are between 50 and 60 “bomb cyclones” every year in the Northern Hemisphere, many of which we don’t notice because they are too far out at sea. But Maue’s research on “bomb cyclones” also don’t show any discernible trends from 1979 to 2010.

Jan 14, 2018

Immigrant Religions Change The Heart Of A Nation

The differences have changed the world's Geo Socio complexity.

Is it asking too much of immigrants, who choose to come to our America, because their hopes and dreams are far more likely to be fulfilled here, to keep the laws of this more desirable place and embrace its flag and Constitution above all others? The religion they profess, and bring with them, if dominant where they came from, was greatly responsibility for the things they disliked about about it. Should these immigrants not also, if they chose America as a better place to live and work and raise their families and worship, turn their backs on the less desirable place they came from and face their new responsibilities and loyalty to the new nation they chose, America? This was expected of all immigrants who came here in past generations and worked for the good of themselves and this nation. To cling to the identity of  Mexican, Central American, Asian, Middle Easterner, or African, instead of "American", is a contradiction of your own choice of where they preferred to be. 

It's like the woman who was so miserable with her trashy, shiftless, jobless, abusive, domineering husband that she left him for another man who worked, supported her, and treated her as his equal ... but she still loves the jerk more than him. Is she right in thinking that though she made the choice, she still has a deeper love and commitment to the man she couldn't stand to live with? How long would number two put up with that contradiction? That is exactly what we Conservative, Constitutional Americans see happening within the all Muslim immigrant neighborhoods in our country. And to a lesser extent among Mexican immigrants who are still waving the Mexican flag and demanding that our immigration laws be changed to suite them. And just because we believe in the right to religious freedom does not mean we believe all religions are equal or acceptable to God, but we leave that judgment to Him.

Theodore Roosevelt's ideas on Immigrants and being an American in 1907. 'In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith, becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an American and nothing but an American...There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag... We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language.. And we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.'

Theodore Roosevelt 1907, a hundred and ten years ago.


During the Spanish-American War, Theodore Roosevelt organized the first Volunteer Cavalry, "the Rough Riders," and captured Cuba's San Juan Hill. He became one of America's military heros and we remained a free Republic.

Elected Vice-President under William McKinley, he became America's youngest President in 1901.

In his book Fear God and Take Your Part, 1916, Theodore Roosevelt wrote:
"Christianity is not the creed of Asia and Africa at this moment simply because the seventh century Christians of Asia and Africa had trained themselves not to fight, whereas the Moslems were trained to fight.

Christianity was saved in Europe solely because the peoples of Europe fought.

If the peoples of Europe in the 7th and 8th centuries, and on up to and including the 17th century, had not possessed a military equality with, and gradually a growing superiority over the Mohammedans, who invaded Europe, Europe would at this moment be Mohammedan and the Christian religion would be exterminated.....

"Wherever the Mohammedans have had complete sway, wherever the Christians have been unable to resist them by the sword, Christianity has ultimately disappeared.
From the hammer of Charles Martel to the sword of Jan Sobieski, Christianity owed its safety in Europe to the fact that it was able to show that it could and would fight as well as the Mohammedan aggressor."

If Theodore Roosevelt put too much emphasis on fighting, modern day Christians put too little. For way too long Christians have been brain-washed to avoid politics and physical conflicts, including personal protection and defense.  That is contrary to Scripture.

Jesus was well aware of the contempt and conflict His teachings would arouse among non-Christians and those who embraced false religions.  Wars have been fought over religion. I think all wars are fought, at their root, over spiritual conflicts, not just the "political disagreements" or other surface causes which are manifested and argued. That is why Christ's first mention of the sword was, "Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword." Matt.10:34. He knew the devil would stir up conflict, both on an individual level and between organizations and nations. He knew and intended it to be so. "I came not to send peace, but a sword."It was not primarily conflict between men or nations but between God and Satan.

The Bible condones the use of weapons by law enforcement in Romans 13:4."For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.
Jesus even encouraged personal protection when he told His disciples,  ".... he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.... And they said, Lord, behold, here are two swords  (They already had two).   And he said unto them, It is enough."  Luke 22:36 & 38. Jesus was not encouraging His disciples to start fights or resort to force without reason, or draw their swords for other than real danger.  But He did say .... "buy one".  However, just two among the twelve Apostles were "enough".  He wasn't overdoing the necessity of having personal protection and discouraged the unnecessary or habitual blandishment of weapons.".... They that take the sword shall perish with the sword." Matt.26:52. If you draw your gun, you may very well die.
It is commonly understood that people who quickly resort to weapons or those who are involved in law enforcement or the military very often die during the conflicts they face. The use of weapons should only occur after expert training, practice, and when unavoidable. Even then, unless in war or extreme danger, it should be to stop the culprit, not to kill him. If I face a drugged up addict or mugger, I stop him, if possible; but if I face a terrorist with a bomb or a mob, I do what is necessary to protect myself or someone else.

The Muslims have conquered much of the world's people and territory by the use of  intimidation, threat, fanatical persistence and the force of weapons. Their motivation is their evil religion conquering and subjugating all so-called infidel unbelievers in their false god. If it were just politics or civil disagreements, they might give up or turn back, but it is "religion" and they will never give up or stop until they concur or convert the "infidels" or die themselves. We live in dangerous times. Pray a lot and keep your personal protection clean, loaded, secure and near. But never forget how inquisitive and unpredictable children can be. A sword will not accidentally go off .... a gun will. Very few have ever been accidentally killed by a sword or knife .... many have been accidentally killed by a gun. 
Be prepared .... but be wise... or do not have a gun at all. RB

Jan 12, 2018

With Increased Speed, Latter Times Prophecy Unfolds

Israel News recently reported that Rabbi Mendal Kessin, who, "Interprets modern events from a Torah perspective", lectures that President Trump's actions and his recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's Capitol, are bringing the world closer to the coming of Messiah. He also believes that the U.N. is the Biblical "Gog and Magog" because of its constant anti-Israel position, and that "Gog" is the prophetic name of the enemies of Israel.

Be that as it may. True it may be; it is simply his interpretation of prophecy. But this we know, that neither Obama nor Trump could possibly have been elected if God had not allowed it. Both were political miracles, which just could not happen in this country. Obama, as a despotic King Nebuchadnezer, for the apparent disciplinary chastisement upon our spiritually declining nation ... And Trump as a worldly, pagan, King Cyrus or King Darius to defend God's people against their other pagan enemies, and to restore their Temple and freedom to worship. Trump seems to be the worldly but impressed "friend" of Israel and of Christians. Obama certainly was not. But both became President for God's own will and purposes, not for their righteousness. That does not mean God approved of the moral or immoral character or worldview of either of them, any more than He approved that of Kings Nebuchadnezer, Cyrus or Darius. But God raises up kings and puts down kings for His own divine will in His dealing with Satan, with nations, with the Jews, with Christians, and with all the world's people. World conflicts and politics often get out of the control of men but nothing ever gets out of the control of God. No ruler who ever reigned got there except that God allowed it to fulfill His own perfect will ... positive or negative.

"...He removeth kings, and setteth up kings ..." Dan.2:21.

"The king's heart is in the hand of the Lord, as the rivers of water: he turneth it whithersoever he will." Prov.21:1.

"By me kings reign ..." He said, in Prov.8:15. 

Neither President Trump nor Priminister Benjamine Netanyahu are kings, but they are the rulers of free nations and serve their nations as a type of king. Both these men have developed a timely inclination to spiritual things which is very obviously affecting their decisions and actions. Trump has moved decidedly close to evangelical Christians, and Israel. He created a committee of Christian pastors who advise him on religious and spiritual matters. Which, I believe, motivated his decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel's Capitol. From what I am reading, Netanyahu regularly attends a study of Biblical prophecy, in Israel, and Trump is listening to Christian.
At a speech at the Auschwitz death camp in 2009, for example, Netanyahu declared that the prophecies of Ezekiel 37 — the dry bones of the Jewish people coming back together miraculously to form the State of Israel — had come to pass in his lifetime.
Netanyahu also alluded, in a speech, to the Biblical prophecies of a Persian king named “Cyrus” who would rise up one day and set the Jewish people free from captivity.
“The Jewish people’s odyssey through time has taught us two things: Never give up hope, always remain vigilant. Hope charts the future. Vigilance protects it,” Netanyahu said. “Today our hope for the future is challenged by a nuclear-armed Iran that seeks our destruction. But I want you to know, that wasn’t always the case. Some 2,500 years ago the great Persian king Cyrus ended the Babylonian exile of the Jewish people. He issued a famous edict in which he proclaimed the right of the Jews to return to the land of Israel and rebuild the Jewish temple in Jerusalem. That’s a Persian decree. And thus began a historic friendship between the Jews and the Persians that lasted until modern times.”
Also when Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu addressed an annual gathering of world leaders at the UN General Assembly, He warned the international community of the growing threat of militant Islam. The prime minister issued a warning of the increasing visibility and violence wrought by Islamist terrorists across the world.
Then the prime minister quoted the ancient Biblical words of the prophet Isaiah, who “taught us nearly 3,000 years ago in Jerusalem to speak truth to power:”   “For the sake of Zion, I will not be silent. For the sake of Jerusalem, I will not be still. Until her justice shines bright, and her salvation glows like a flaming torch.”
In the final analysis, it matters not that God uses both believers, unbelievers, and doubters in the fulfilling of His perfect will and the deliverance of His chosen nation, Israel and His New Testament Christians. Most important to us is that we recognize His ever-present hand in the affairs of men and give Him the glory for our deliverance in whatever way He chooses to accomplish it. RB

Jan 11, 2018

He Wrote The Fictitious Book On Trump - Who Is He?

The Michael Wolfe behind the mask ...

Michael Wolfe (born 3 April 1945)[1] is an American poet, author, and the President and Co-Executive Producer of Unity Productions Foundation. He has been a frequent lecturer on Islamic issues at universities across the United States including HarvardGeorgetownStanfordSUNY Buffalo, and Princeton. He holds a degree in Classics from Wesleyan University.[1]

As a Muslim [3] he performed the pilgrimage to Mecca in 1990 and wrote extensively about it. Wolfe's first works on Islam were a pair of books from Grove Press on the pilgrimage to Mecca: The Hadj (1993; 2015),[4] a first-person travel account, and One Thousand Roads to Mecca... In 2010, Wolfe was included in "The 500 Most Influential Muslims," (Third Edition).

In 2002, UPF produced its first full-length film, called Muhammad: Legacy of a Prophet, a two-hour television documentary on the life and times of the Islamic prophet, Muhammad. The film, which Wolfe co-created and co-produced, received a national broadcast on PBS[12] and subsequent international broadcasts on National Geographic International.[13]

A key tenet of Islam is "To lie to and about your enemy".

My Comment...

Wolfe's book on Trump has already sold a million copies. How hungry can Democrats be to fill their eyes and ears and minds with half-truths and lies? There is a precept in my mind which I will claim as my own and apply here. There is no gain in spending your self to destroy, with the accusation,  your enemy, who is well known for his upright honesty and character, or at least his innocence of your charges. For only his other enemies will believe it. His friends will turn your hose of venom back against you, and you will be conversely and more miserably poisoned. Also, there is no gain in lying about the devil. For he has thousands of true charges against him already, which everyone knows are factual. To seek to add defamation to Satan's already ruined character is futile and is to engage in the undermining of your own honesty, with the very people you hope to convince. RB

Jan 10, 2018

Only In America

Founded as a Christian Nation!

OCTOBER 26, 1774, the Provincial Congress of Massachusetts reorganized their defenses with one-third of their regiments being "Minutemen," ready to fight at a minute's notice. 

These citizen soldiers drilled on the parade ground, many times led by a deacon or pastor, then went to church for exhortation and prayer. 

The Provincial Congress charged:

"You...are placed by Providence in the post of honor, because it is the post of danger...

The eyes not only of North America and the whole British Empire but of all Europe, are upon you.

Let us be, therefore, altogether solicitous that no disorderly behavior, nothing unbecoming our character as Americans, as citizens and Christians, be justly chargeable to us."

The Provincial Congress issued a Resolution to Massachusetts Bay, 1774:

"Resistance to tyranny becomes the Christian and social duty of each individual...

Continue steadfast, and with a proper sense of your dependence on God, nobly defend those rights which heaven gave, and no man ought to take from us."

In 1967, after 14 years in a Communist prison in Romania, Rev. Richard Wurmbrand stated:

"America is the hope of every enslaved man because it is the last bastion of freedom in the world.

Only America has the power and spiritual resources to stand as a barrier between militant Communism and the people of the world.

_________________________ And yet Liberal Americans still claim America was not founded and settled primarily by Christians. But that is not surprising considering all of their other false claims ... about everything. RB

Jan 9, 2018

Changes In The US, Good Bad And Ugly, Over 100 Yrs.

When half of Americans pay no taxes and are subsidized by the Government, and the other half tolerate the injustice, most of us have lost our sense of which changes to accept and which to reject. The destiny of such a nation, unless a spiritual moral awakening occurs, is bleak indeed. Fervent, repentant prayer, among God's people, is the only hope for America 

The examples below have come about due to technology, medical advancement,  education, the Constitution, the Bill Of Rights, the work ethic, freedom of religion, law, and order,  God's Grace, the gradualism of socialism and irresponsibility, and the politicians who had recently installing The Federal Reserve System which has deflated our money and inflated prices. These changes developed over the past 100 years, since 1917, 13 years before I was born. At 87, I have witnessed most of the changes.

Here are some statistics for the Year 1917 in America: The average life expectancy for men was 47 years. Fuel for cars was sold in drug stores only. Only 14 percent of homes had a bathtub. Only 8 percent of homes had a telephone. The maximum speed limit in most cities was 10 mph. The tallest structure in the world was the Eiffel Tower. The average US wage in 1910 was 22 cents per hour. The average US worker made between $200 & $400 per year. A competent accountant could expect to earn $2000 per year. 

A dentist $2,500 per year. A veterinarian between $1,500 - $4,000 per year. And, a mechanical engineer about $5,000 per year. More than 95 percent of all births took place at home. 

Ninety percent of all Doctors had NO COLLEGE EDUCATION! Instead, they attended so-called medical schools, many of which were condemned in the press. Sugar cost four cents a pound. Eggs were fourteen cents a dozen. Coffee was fifteen cents a pound. Most women only washed their hair once a month, and, used Borax or egg yolks for shampoo. Canada passed a law that prohibited poor people from entering their country for any reason. 

The Five leading causes of death were: 
1.  Pneumonia and influenza 
2.  Tuberculosis 
3.  Diarrhea 
4.  Heart disease 
5.  Stroke 

The American flag had 45 stars ... The population of Las Vegas, Nevada was only 30. Crossword puzzles, canned beer, and iced tea hadn't been invented yet. There was neither a Mother's Day nor a Father's Day. Two out of every 10 adults could not read or write. And, only 6 percent of all Americans had graduated from high school. 

Eighteen percent of households had at least one full-time servant or domestic help... 

There were about 230 reported murders in the ENTIRE U.S.A.!

The U.S. Constitution was held by all as inviolable.

There were no drug addicts or drug pushers.

Abortion, adultery and homosexuality were illegal.

Homosexuals were rare and hid the fact.

State laws were more powerful than Federal laws.

Ministers of the Gospel were the most highly respected citizens.

Jan 8, 2018

A Soldier's Pledge: "As Though Victory Depends On Me Along

The character of commitment to a just cause.

Am I a soldier of the cross,
A follower of the Lamb,
And shall I fear to own His cause,
Or blush to speak His Name?
Must I be carried to the skies
On flowery beds of ease,
While others fought to win the prize,
And sailed through bloody seas?
Are there no foes for me to face?
Must I not stem the flood?
Is this vile world a friend to grace,
To help me on to God?
Sure I must fight if I would reign;
Increase my courage, Lord.
I’ll bear the toil, endure the pain,
Supported by Thy Word.
Thy saints in all this glorious war
Shall conquer, though they die;
They see the triumph from afar,
By faith’s discerning eye.
When that illustrious day shall rise,
And all Thy armies shine
In robes of victory through the skies,
The glory shall be Thine.

I concede your right to disagree with me in my interpretation of holy scripture. Will you also concede my right to determine for myself what I believe it means, and preach it?

I have aggravated a lot of Liberals and Religionists by my preaching and teaching and blog commentary. A woman asked me, "Why don't you stick with religion and avoid politics and secular subjects like Socialism, abortion, homosexual marriages, drug addiction, and government corruption?" First, most "religion" is false religion and sends people to hell, and I have not left that out of my commentary subjects. Nor will I leave out any worldly force which contradicts the scripture and ruins people's lives and families and nations. God has always sent ministers to win souls to Christ, disciple them, and confront the gates of hell which distract, misguide and destroy all that is holy. Part of my calling is to throw light on Lucifer's error and expose him in this continuing Battle of the Ages which was begun by Lucifer ... against God. So my answer to the question the lady raised is, "Because my faith is a practical, realistic faith. First, we Christians must pray, believe, and trust God to protect and bless; but then, work, plan, sacrifice, prepare and fight when necessary ... because faith without works is dead and dead faith will not accomplish anything but a funeral.  "But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead? For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also." James 2:20&26.

In the speech in which President Reagan read the "Soldier's Pledge", he also referenced the battle of Chosin Reservoir in which I and my "Chosin Few" brothers fought Atheistic Communism. Yes, we prayed, but we also killed a reported 34,000 Chinese Communist Soldiers, who were killing innocent civilians, in that one eighteen day battle.  God helped us in a similar way He helped the armies of his people Israel all through the Old Testament. All Israeli soldiers were not believers but they fought alongside their Israeli compatriots against the pagan's who attacked them and their nation. 

If you are going to join Christ as your Lord and follow Him, you will be attacked by Satan and his henchmen, flunkies, and hirelings. There will be times when we must rebuke demons, expose them and use a whip, as Christ did on the money-changers, or carry a weapon as He charged his Apostles to do in Luke 22:36...   "... He that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one."

Here is a worthy pledge for every soldier in the armies of freedom-loving countries and every civilian also defending those freedoms and supporting those soldiers. Not to mention facing down the devil's sycophants.... or removing them. RB

The Soldier's Pledge:


No comments: