Feb 8, 2017

Here Are Two Elements Of The Mystery Of Iniquity

Secret Power of Lawlessness Penalizing good .... Rewarding evil 

Common Sense Commentary:

In order to understand the Democrat Party's long list of contradictory, counterfeit and misguided priorities, such as globalism, socialism, same-sex marriage, abortion, global warming, anti-Israel, and anti-Christian policy, you must understand the thought process of an adult with either an adolescent mind or an evil one. Because he looks like an adult, you assume there must be an element of mature logic in his thinking, which you have overlooked. His mature appearance, education, experience, and certainty of his conclusions, cause you to rationalize that he must have some reason to believe as he does. And there is a reason, but not a logical one. The reason is illusion, delusion or, if he is mature, it could be laziness, greed, ignorance or evil. Below are two examples of Democrat delusion or perhaps, evil. RB

Nearly 70% Of Democrats Believe Other Religions Are Just As Deadly As Islam (Google it to find articles)

A recent CBS Poll revealed that six of seven Democrats believe that Islam is no more violent than Christianity. Six of seven Democrats. That sort of reasoning is as far removed from reality, justice and truth as their other delusions of approving abortions on demand  and homosexual marriage. That kind of insanity goes beyond extremism all the way to demon possession.
Since the Islamic terrorist slaughter of 3000 innocent lives in New York on 9/11, Islamic terrorists have carried out more than 30,257 attacks which have murdered thousands more. For the vast majority of Democrats to believe Christianity is doing the same is beyond human comprehension into what the Bible calls "The mystery of iniquity" in 2 Thess. 2:7. "For the mystery of iniquity (Secret power of lawlessness) doth already work: only he (Holy Spirit) who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way (at the Rapture of believers)." This verse tells us that this evil mystery of iniquity, which was already at work in the rejection of Christ and His brutal treatment, in spite of the Jewish Leaders' knowledge that He fulfilled all of the Biblical prophecies of their coming Messiah.  That same mystery of iniquity has viciously pursued Christ's church for the last 2000 years like a pack of the hounds of Baskerville and is still attacking it today. It is a mystery of iniquity. RB

Jesus said...
"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." John 8:44. 
Global Warming Died 15 Years Ago.
Its corpse may be buried this week.

Global Warming's farce calls for carbon credits (money) to be taken from producers and given to failed nations. It is a dodge to punish success and reward failure, and a second Liberal Democrat mystery of iniquity. It is a secret power of lawlessness penalizing good and rewarding evil.

This from Fox News Science
Federal scientist cooked climate change books ahead of Obama presentation, whistle blower charges

A key Obama administration scientist brushed aside inconvenient data that showed a slowdown in global warming in compiling an alarming 2015 report that coincided with the White House participation in the Paris Climate Conference, a whistle blower is alleging.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), in a major 2013 report, concluded global temperatures had shown a smaller increase from 1998 to 2012 than any similar period over the past 30 to 60 years. But a blockbuster, June 2015 paper by a team of federal scientists led by Thomas Karl, published in the journal Science in June 2015 and later known as the “pausebuster" paper sought to discredit the notion of a slowdown in warming.

Karl was director of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Centers for Environmental Information when the report was published. (NOAA) "Our new analysis suggests that the apparent hiatus may have been largely the result of limitations in past datasets, and that the rate of warming over the first 15 years of this century has, in fact, been as fast or faster than that seen over the last half of the 20th century," Karl, who was at the time director of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Centers for Environmental Information, said at the time.

Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, chairman of the House Science Committee, questioned the timing, noting the paper was published just before the Obama Administration’s Clean Power Plan was submitted to the Paris Climate Conference of 2015.

"In the summer of 2015, whistleblowers alerted the Committee that the Karl study was rushed to publication before underlying data issues were resolved to help influence public debate about the so-called Clean Power Plan and upcoming Paris climate conference," Smith said in a statement. "Since then, the Committee has attempted to obtain information that would shed further light on these allegations, but was obstructed at every turn by the previous administration’s officials."

Karl denied the paper was released to boost the plan.

Karl’s neglect of the IPCC data was purposeful, according to John Bates, a recently retired scientist from the National Climactic Data Center at the NOAA. Bates came forward just days ago to charge that the 2015 study selectively used misleading and unverified data – effectively putting NOAA’s thumb on the scale.

In an interview with the Daily Mail, Bates said Karl was “insisting on decisions and scientific choices that maximized warming and minimized documentation… in an effort to discredit the notion of a global warming pause, rushed so that he could time publication to influence national and international deliberations on climate policy.”

For example, Karl allegedly adjusted temperature data collected by robot buoys upward to match earlier data from ocean-going ships. That was problematic, Bates said, because ships generate heat and could cause readings to vary.

“They had good data from buoys,” Bates told the Daily Mail. “And they threw it out and ‘corrected’ it by using the bad data from ships. You never change good data to agree with bad, but that’s what they did – so as to make it look as if the sea was warmer.” Bates, who could not be reached for comment, but has published some of his allegations in a blog, claims to have documentation of his explosive charges and indicated more revelations are coming.

A NOAA spokesman, in an email to The Washington Times, said NOAA “stands behind its world-class scientists” but also that it “takes seriously any allegation that its internal processes have not been followed and will review the matter appropriately.”

Bates is not the first to question Karl’s conclusions. A paper by Canadian climate modeler John Fyfe questioned the 2015 study. As he put it, in a 2016 article from the journal Nature Climate Change, “there is a mismatch between what the climate models are producing and what observations are showing. We can’t ignore it.”

Climate scientists have closed ranks around Karl. A study published last month in Science Advances, by Zeke Hausfather of University of California Berkeley and five others, claims to confirm Karl’s findings.

In addition, climate scientist Peter Thorne, who has worked with the NOAA, said Bates wasn’t involved in the work that he’s criticizing. Bates disputed the assertion.

While Karl, and other scientists who believe man-made climate change poses a major threat had the ear of the Obama administration, President Trump has shown signs of skepticism. It remains to be seen from which scientists he will take his cue.

No comments: