To enhance the appearance of their superior intelligence, they have incorporated extensive, complicated words and phrases but avoided the clear absence of even one missing link between animals, subhumans and humans. It's called straining at a gnat and swallowing a camel. The similarities in all the species of creation, with sight, hearing, digestive systems, birth etc. prove a common architec not a kinship of evolving species.
The new science of DNA has thrown the evolutionary community into a confused, arguing bunch of evolving intellects who are now trying to digest new revelations about human origins while retrofitting it into their worn old theory. They remind me of the mechanic trying to explain to the car owner why he had to replace the entire engine when he had previously told him it was only in need of a new spark plug.
Even the new, DNA version, of the evolutionary fairy tale, is totally out of focus except for the one new revision that all of our DNA came from one original couple ... a woman and a man. They even name the woman EVE and identify where this couple lived, by tracking ethnic DNA movement, to somewhere in the middle east or eastern Africa. Ironically, without a taint of blush, they also deduct millions of years off of their evolutionary tale and date this original conception at only somewhere between 100,000 and 200,000 years ago. That is a whale of an admission but a minnow of apology. If Darwin and his theory worshipers are forced to make an adjustment of millions of years, what else are they wrong about? The whole rotten apple with evolving worm in residence. RB
Even the new, DNA version, of the evolutionary fairy tale, is totally out of focus except for the one new revision that all of our DNA came from one original couple ... a woman and a man. They even name the woman EVE and identify where this couple lived, by tracking ethnic DNA movement, to somewhere in the middle east or eastern Africa. Ironically, without a taint of blush, they also deduct millions of years off of their evolutionary tale and date this original conception at only somewhere between 100,000 and 200,000 years ago. That is a whale of an admission but a minnow of apology. If Darwin and his theory worshipers are forced to make an adjustment of millions of years, what else are they wrong about? The whole rotten apple with evolving worm in residence. RB
Mitochondrial Eve
From Wikipedia, the free EncyclopediaIn human genetics, Mitochondrial Eve is the matrilineal most recent common ancestor (MRCA), in a direct, unbroken, maternal line, of all currently living humans, who is estimated to have lived approximately 100,000–200,000 years ago. This is the most recent woman from whom all living humans today descend, in an unbroken line, on their mother’s side, and through the mothers of those mothers, and so on, back until all lines converge on one person. Because all mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) generally (but see paternal mtDNA transmission) is passed from mother to offspring without recombination, all mtDNA in every living person is directly descended from hers by definition, differing only by the mutations that over generations have occurred in the germ cell mtDNA since the conception of the original "Mitochondrial Eve".
___________________________________
Those are high sounding, intellectual words describing, within touching distance, of how we got here, without calling it "Creation" and willfully avoiding even a glimpse in that direction.
The only thing evolving is the theory itself.
Stand by for additional revelations, hopes and changes in the evolving theory of evolution. RB
No comments:
Post a Comment